[Suggestion] [Sentence] Sex Open.PM

[Rafael_Rosse]

Hi guys I propose to add Make love to SA:MP

how people use mods and there are gta for mods and so on





Animations "SEX": (At the moment, they are not in SA-MP, Kalcor does not approve.)





(Image Removed)







the mods themselves xD

[yodawg]

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[BigETI]

There is not a reason to constraint for special animations. However the sex animations are only in GTA SA 1.0 as far as I know.

[Rafael_Rosse]

There is not a reason to constraint for special animations. However the sex animations are only in GTA SA 1.0 as far as I know.

There are no animations in the SA:MP ?please implement

---

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

write me on the forum in a personal message skinu photo understand

[Riddick]

In SA-MP those animations are restricted because probably they could get overused and Kalcor doesn't understand that it is game. Animations shouldn't be restricted, MTA doesn't do that either.

There is not a reason to constraint for special animations. However the sex animations are only in GTA SA 1.0 as far as I know.

Doesn't SA-MP work for GTA SA 1.0 only? I believe it does. 2.0 version of GTA SA disabled mods or at least they have tried though.

[Rafael_Rosse]

In SA-MP those animations are restricted because probably they could get overused and Kalcor doesn't understand that it is game. Animations shouldn't be restricted, MTA doesn't do that either.

There is not a reason to constraint for special animations. However the sex animations are only in GTA SA 1.0 as far as I know.

Doesn't SA-MP work for GTA SA 1.0 only? I believe it does. 2.0 version of GTA SA disabled mods or at least they have tried though.

They are disabled in the SAMP MTA, but ?can turn them on, and it will be cool))

removed skin, in SA:MP, girls, Groove Street

[Hyder]

We should not agree this because many of people will be under 18 and kids will be effected by that

[Rafael_Rosse]

We should not agree this because many of people will be under 18 and kids will be effected by that

this system is already going to be done on my server and how will other servers do at its discretion

And I do not think that children play in GTA



we have grown up I play with 0.3 z 0.3 x



i play 2010 of the year



1 my server is 2012 2013 ?2 is my server 2014 and here is my 3 server 2017-2018-2019

[BigETI]

We should not agree this because many of people will be under 18 and kids will be effected by that

GTA San Andreas is rated for mature. Parents should be responsible for the safety of their own children.

[Rafael_Rosse]

We should not agree this because many of people will be under 18 and kids will be effected by that

GTA San Andreas is rated for mature. Parents should be responsible for the safety of their ?own children.

Right, ?Granny does not give the kid to buy GTA

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwHu1D4t5T8]



I hope for this sex open.mp

will be))

[Gravityfalls]

We should not agree this because many of people will be under 18 and kids will be effected by that

GTA San Andreas is rated for mature. Parents should be responsible for the safety of their ?own children.

Seconded. Are you some kind of retard to say that we should not add those animations because?kids are?playing this game lmao. Go play Fortnite lol. This game is rated AO.

[AkiraR]

I vouch against implementing them. Even though they are there utilizing them for other servers to use is just kinda unnecessary. For a bunch of adults saying the game is rated eight-teen and over, go out and do the freaky not get an e-hard over a video game. You two wanna do something nasty over a video game? Grab each other's Skype, Snap, etc. No reason to necessarily need to do it over a game.

[Wolf]

I vouch against implementing them. Even though they are there utilizing them for other servers to use is just kinda unnecessary. For a bunch of adults saying the game is rated eight-teen and over, go out and do the freaky not get an e-hard over a video game. You two wanna do something nasty over a video game? Grab each other's Skype, Snap, etc. No reason to necessarily need to do it over a game.

Hahahahahaha?





Ye

[Rafael_Rosse]

I vouch against implementing them. Even though they are there utilizing them for other servers to use is just kinda unnecessary. For a bunch of adults saying the game is rated eight-teen and over, go out and do the freaky not get an e-hard over a video game. You two wanna do something nasty over a video game? Grab each other's Skype, Snap, etc. No reason to necessarily need to do it over a game.

not on all rp servers can this system be made and you are only 1 against all ostolnye for so let them do

[Maks5]

Pretty entertaining. I will follow the news)

[Expert*]

If in the future we will be able to add new animations there is no reason to block it.

Fun part is that you can slit other players throat, shoot em, burn em, but dryhumping is 18.

It's like you must be 18 to visit this site on r**tube, just hit yes and u good to go.

[Sasino97]

I think they should not be restricted, but I personally would not use them in my game mode.

[Rafael_Rosse]

I think they should not be restricted, but I personally would not use them in my game mode.

but girls and boys will use them, because then why girls on role-plays? play what they do there?) Yes, and come play role

[Bork]

Hi guys I propose to add Make love to SA:MP

how people use mods and there are gta for mods and so on





Animations "SEX": (At the moment, they are not in SA-MP, Kalcor does not approve.)





(Image Removed)







the mods themselves xD

fucking hell the amount of times you've asked for sex in open.mp is fucking annoying

go watch porn or something you can get free accounts off of certain websites

[Rafael_Rosse]

Hi guys I propose to add Make love to SA:MP

how people use mods and there are gta for mods and so on





Animations "SEX": (At the moment, they are not in SA-MP, Kalcor does not approve.)





(Image Removed)







the mods themselves xD

fucking hell the amount of times you've asked for sex in open.mp is fucking annoying

go watch porn or something you can get free accounts off of certain websites

SA:MP ?Porn gives realism pp itd and the interest of the burn and all for so why not? and kalkor does not approve why go in the footsteps of Kalcora?



[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qdYSYAKUyY&t=521s]







SA:MP replacement ANIMATION No mods









if we want to see online, etc. and GTA sa, make the system live sex just as kalkor doesn?t want to do anything, and even in the sampler there?s almost nothing to do except televizor sex and voice chat, what else do you add to the samp?

[javelin]

LMAO WHY IN THE WORLD

[Shaggy]

Wut...

[Southclaws]

Girls exist in real life not just san andreas btw.

[Rvcboy]

*Second Life intensifies*

[hiddos]

uhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[ronfino]

this thread will probably affect the dev's opinion about the IFP native implementation, thank you for ruining everything

[Codeah]

Hi guys I propose to add Make love to SA:MP

how people use mods and there are gta for mods and so on





Animations "SEX": (At the moment, they are not in SA-MP, Kalcor does not approve.)



(Image Removed)







the mods themselves xD

Please for the love of god, no.

[Rafael_Rosse]

Hi guys I propose to add Make love to SA:MP

how people use mods and there are gta for mods and so on





Animations "SEX": (At the moment, they are not in SA-MP, Kalcor does not approve.)



(Image Removed)







the mods themselves xD

Please for the love of god, no.

ja ja das musst du tun

[iReal Worlds]

We should not agree this because many of people will be under 18 and kids will be effected by that

Nothing from the original game should be censored. Every single thing should be at least toggleable by either the server developers, players or both.

[ohmios]

Nothing from the original game should be censored. Every single thing should be at least toggleable by either the server developers, players or both.

I completely agree with this. But these animations are in a gray area, because even though they were included in every original DVD of the game, they were also hidden because Rockstar didn't actually intended anyone to see them.?



Should said?animations be accessible even though Rockstar did not intend to?



Personally at first I would say they should be accessible because we all know GTA SA should have the rating with or without sex, and it's not up to the mod developers to censor the game.?BUT the Hot Coffee mod controversy happened only because the modding community found about these animations. Followed by a patch by Rockstar that completely removed the animations and everything related to them.



So, taking everything into consideration, my personal opinion is that if we really respect Rockstar, then the animations shouldn't be accessible, as they weren't intended to be in the first place. Everything else is outside this gray zone and should not be censored.

We should not agree this because many of people will be under 18 and kids will be effected by that

Also saying there's kids playing this game is not a real argument, because the game wasn't intended for kids in the first place. It's up to the parents censor inappropriate games to their kids AND what they do or have access to on the internet.



All that being said this is useless because the developers take the final?decision?anyway :P

[Rafael_Rosse]

UPdate

[ronfino]

someone delete this thread

[ohmios]

Responding to my own post because I realized I was wrong on some things.

these animations are in a gray area, because even though they were included in every original DVD of the game, they were also hidden because Rockstar didn't actually intended anyone to see them.

However, the oral sex animations are clearly visible in the background during one scene of the mission "Cleaning the Hood," even in the re-released game.

Should said animations be accessible even though Rockstar did not intend to?

One of the animations made it to the final game and is clearly visible. So there's no reason to censor that one at least.

BUT the Hot Coffee mod controversy happened only because the modding community found about these animations. Followed by a patch by Rockstar that completely removed the animations and everything related to them.

And I just check and it turns out all it takes to enable the sex minigame is changing a single bit in either one of the game files or any of the game saves. So yeah... that's a very lazy way of trying to hide it.

if we really respect Rockstar, then the animations shouldn't be accessible, as they weren't intended to be in the first place.

Any mod to the game?already constitutes a violation of the End User License Agreement. But that doesn't mean we should throw everything through window and stop modding, right?





To be completely honest I don't mind at all if open.mp enables these animations, the oral sex animation at least should be enabled. One side of me actually wants every sex animation to be enabled and see every server using the animations having "" in their tittle. Only because fuck underage people, little dumb twelve year old kids shouldn't be playing this game in the first place. But my other side fears that Rockstar might notice and remind them of their most controversial days and have their lawyers send a cease and desist email to the good developers of open.mp. I don't want that to happen, I already lost one mod with a huge community arround it because of a simple cease and desist email. Can't let that happen again.

[MR.GHOST]

Seems childish to ask o:mp dev to do something as?satch?seems?unprofessional and kidish i suggest to not do it

[JustMichael]

If we were to implement this stuff, we would need to enforce a strict policy to protect children. This would mean servers would be requires to inform the users that sexual material is present on the server and have them accept it, or we would need servers to hide this material for players who are under 18 (this will be hard to implement).



In my honest opinion, I don't believe this stuff needs to be added at all. I feel that we have gone this long without the need for them, and the only reason you need to use these animations would be for inappropriate usage.



I am all for servers to have the freedom to do what they want, but some things need to be careful approached as the backlash could affect many users.

[BigETI]

It's not a matter of adding stuff, but it's a matter of what animations have to be blocked at the client or server. Sure we need to a way to inform the user that a server might use explicit content and the user has to agree whenever it wants to play on the server or not. It is not possible to ensure that the user is legally allowed to play that game, however parents are entirely responsible for their own children. It is wrong to block game content even if it is explicit is just wrong in my opinion. Imagine we block everything that is explicit. People can do sex animations which is explicit, so that has to be blocked. Guns and drugs are explicit, so they have to be blocked aswell. Knifes allow to slit open throats so knifes have to be blocked. Characters can curse and say racial slurs, so all dialogs containing them have to be blocked aswell. The game is encouraging theft and murder so stealing vehicles and killing people has to be disabled. Is this still GTA San Andreas for you? Do you want to experience that game?

[DTV]

Don't see what the deal is with not allowing them and besides, this is going to go open source eventually so people will be able to add it themselves if it isn't implemented.

[Rafael_Rosse]

If we were to implement this stuff, we would need to enforce a strict policy to protect children. This would mean servers would be requires to inform the users that sexual material is present on the server and have them accept it, or we would need servers to hide this material for players who are under 18 (this will be hard to implement).



In my honest opinion, I don't believe this stuff needs to be added at all. I feel that we have gone this long without the need for them, and the only reason you need to use these animations would be for inappropriate usage.



I am all for servers to have the freedom to do what they want, but some things need to be careful approached as the backlash could affect many users.

The fact is that server players can not do these systems from animations or systems, and they will not know about it for the role of play sex, then the most thing on Gambit RP full RP is where they download mods and have sex and not some children there, etc.

---

Don't see what the deal is with not allowing them and besides, this is going to go open source eventually so people will be able to add it themselves if it isn't implemented.

right, server developers, for example, can not add these animations to the server using the dm mode ?how are they killing each other, etc., and there are no houses, etc.



role play server ?developers will also want to do ?do and on the role of the play server ?I will be engaged

---

Seems childish to ask o:mp dev to do something as?satch?seems?unprofessional and kidish i suggest to not do it

Role Play Servere Zbs sex poidet

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HG4dvlXL4sc]









I think even all schoolchildren know about it and want it so I don?t think to limit it

[ohmios]

If we were to implement this stuff, we would need to enforce a strict policy to protect children.?

I agree, an age verification window where the user enters his birthday accompanied by a message saying what is kind of content that isn't appropriate for underage players should be enough.

This would mean servers would be requires to inform the users that sexual material is present on the server and have them accept it, or we would need servers to hide this material for players who are under 18 (this will be hard to implement).

Just remind every user at the start of the mod that the game itself is on America (since only the 1.0 version of the game is probably going to be supported) and (all versions) on Europe. And then ask the user for his birthday.



This should be done even if the animations are disabled.

[RenanMsV]

It's not a matter of adding stuff, but it's a matter of what animations have to be blocked at the client or server. Sure we need to a way to inform the user that a server might use explicit content and the user has to agree whenever it wants to play on the server or not. It is not possible to ensure that the user is legally allowed to play that game, however parents are entirely responsible for their own children. It is wrong to block game content even if it is explicit is just wrong in my opinion. Imagine we block everything that is explicit. People can do sex animations which is explicit, so that has to be blocked. Guns and drugs are explicit, so they have to be blocked aswell. Knifes allow to slit open throats so knifes have to be blocked. Characters can curse and say racial slurs, so all dialogs containing them have to be blocked aswell. The game is encouraging theft and murder so stealing vehicles and killing people has to be disabled. Is this still GTA San Andreas for you? Do you want to experience that game?

Yes!



Age verification? guys its 2019!?Any 4 years old?can click a button to confirm they have 18.

• This game is .
  
  
• Parents are responsible by their childs and what they're playing.
  
  
• If age is a problem we should cut the whole game.
  
  
• No game content should be cut!