Timers module

[Y_Less]

I understand that the prefix is there to be able to quickly identify the module it belongs to, but imho I don't think that's necessary. But then again, I think this comes down to personal taste.



One more thing: I think some of the timer functions lack a certain consistency in terms of naming.

Code:

native Timer_Get[b]Time[/b][i]Remaining[/i](Timer:timer);

native Timer_Get[b]Calls[/b][i]Remaining[/i](Timer:timer);

should be...

Code:

native Timer_Get[i]Remaining[/i][b]Time[/b](Timer:timer);

native Timer_Get[i]Remaining[/i][b]Calls[/b](Timer:timer);

to be in line with...

Code:

native Timer_GetTotalCalls(Timer:timer);

as the latter sounds more natural.

You're right about the mixed verb/noun order, I'll fix that.



As for module prefixes, that's now quite well established. It gives a nice consistent naming scheme, and there's a longer-term goal you'll have to wait for to see...