[Suggestion] Allow RemoveBuildingForPlayer to be virtual word dependant

[Mave]

With SA-MP once you "remove a building" it's gone in every single VW.



Thanks in advance for considering this suggestion!

[savvin]

It disappears because you remove the object completely from the game. Logically, no?

[EvilShadeZ]

I would rather suggest RestoreObjectForPlayer(playerid,object) or RestoreAllObjects(playerid) when open.mp client is launched. With these you can remove/restore when necessary (even in worlds)

[Pinch]

I would rather suggest RestoreObjectForPlayer(playerid,object) or RestoreAllObjects(playerid) when open.mp client is launched. With these you can remove/restore when necessary (even in worlds)

It'd be same as if you created MAX_OBJECTS size array and stored such data so go ahead, it' already possible in pure PAWN if y guys really need this?:"D

[EvilShadeZ]

I would rather suggest RestoreObjectForPlayer(playerid,object) or RestoreAllObjects(playerid) when open.mp client is launched. With these you can remove/restore when necessary (even in worlds)

It'd be same as if you created MAX_OBJECTS size array and stored such data so go ahead, it' already possible in pure PAWN if y guys really need this?:"D

Not necessarily possible. Yes, you can replace it with CreateObject or maybe a streamed object, but both are non-perfect solutions. One is eating in your global object limit, while the other one can have streaming issues, especially when combined with SetPlayerPos.