Time for my side I believe. You are all partially right, but not in the ways you may think. I am not trying to split the community, I am not trying to start a rival to SA:MP, and one important side point: I am not stealing anyone's code. You all think the cat is out of the bag because of one poorly worded post missing all context of the conversation it was a part of. You got a peek in to the bag and think the whole thing is stupid, which is understandable given the lack of information. I was trying to give the important points without revealing too many details, unfortunately that backfired because now you only have half a story from which to draw conclusions.



So let's put it all out there.

• I am not trying to split the community. However, someone IS trying to destroy it - they have hoarded information, withheld long sought updates, threatened to delete the whole forums (last week), and bans anyone who says that maybe that's not great. This person has already split the community - releasing two separate parallel versions of the mod, then wondering why uptake on one was not as all-encommpasing as originally envisioned. For over a year people have asked for 0.3.7 and 0.3dl to be merged, while he just sat there and wondered if there was actually anyone that wanted it. He has said that he believes the community is dying, SA:MP is dying, and only has a year or two left; and is content to just watch it happen. Some of us disagree and have tried to convince him to do something - either carry on or pass on the reigns. The community shrinking is probably inevitable, but it will only die if not supported - and that's what happening right now.
  
  
  
  There is an unofficial discord, where yes people sometimes have fun and joke around with each other. But it wasn't founded as a place for rebellion. It came in to being because people liked SA:MP, and people use Discord, thus the community naturally wanted to combine both. There's an unofficial forums, Kalcor himself has previously said if you don't like these ones, make your own, but now bans those that do. However neither the forums nor the discord are run by me. They are simply a result of the official areas failing to move forward. That's not splitting, that's progressing.
  
  
  
  
• I am not trying to start a rival to SA:MP. Two of the words there are wrong "start", and "rival". I'm not "starting" anything, I was trying to gauge further interest in a project well under way. These are the commits from just the last year:
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  There's nothing new about this, so what is this? And why is it not a rival?
  
  
  
  
• I did once leave SA:MP, yes, but that was 6 years ago - get over it!
  
  

• He doesn't believe I'm capable of adding major new features. Of course he isn't adding any either, and actually doesn't believe there are any to be added, so why would that matter?
  
  
• He wanted a plan. My main priorities were to fix bugs, improve the obvious gaps in the API, and create a better platform for other languages - i.e. a proper C/plugin API. Not even difficult tasks and ones I've more than shown I'm capable of. But apparently that doesn't qualify as a plan.
  
  
• In his words exactly "they don't deserve it". That's what he thinks of this community that apparently I am the one trying to split up, and the idea of someone trying to carry it on.
  
  

samp-async-dialogs







Async dialog handling with PawnPlus tasks.



Installation



Simply install to your project:

• IllidanS4 for PawnPlus, which allowing this and even more awesome stuff
  
  
• TommyB for helping me test it out on a real environment
  
  

Hello, I share dog pics daily, thanks.

You can share any dog pics you want, yours or from social media!

(There would be?a separate topic for non-dog pics so please don't post them here! :p)

Something I've been testing recently, prove the concept of Animated objects in UGMP, works pretty fine!



[Video: https://youtu.be/WXMrtdOK4oM]





Finally, I can post UGMP stuff without them magically disappearing like on SAMP Forums.

I've seen a tutorial on function overloading but that just seems kind of bad.?



I'm creating a function to manipulate entity data (players, houses, businesses, etc.). Since I plan to generate sql queries inside the function I wanted to have the ability of manipulating with player data if the player is online or offline.



My question is, is there any possibility of creating function overloading with the first parameter either being int (playerid) and string (playername). I guess it creates a problem with one being variable and other an array.?



I have been searching forums, github, pawn documentation but still nothing. I figured if anybody can help me it must be Y_Less.

Hello Grand Theft Auto Gods and Goddesses. Are we allowed to post youtube videos here or is that illegal?



I don't want to be banned for sharing a vevo channel?or samp dm video from YouTube!

Support me on SoundCloud and Facebook.



https://soundcloud.com/ypmgmusic



https://www.facebook.com/yaipmg/



Tell me if you like it! :)

TFA_SAMP - 1st two-factor authentication method for SA-MP.

A huge thanks to Authy (https://www.authy.com/) for providing the web APIs.

Include release under GPL v2 OSL (open source license) - click here for more information.

Part of the include is made in PHP.



Hello everyone.



Recently I was thinking of a new include to release, and I thought about a two-factor authentication method for SA-MP, something like it has never existed before. This include does not directly provide the authentication method, it is just a way to communicate with the service that provides so, which in this case is Authy.



Authy provides also free-plans for development or fairly small communities.

Visit https://www.authy.com/ for more information.



If you don't know what a two-factor authentication method is, read this page.



However, here's a short description.

Quote:Multi-factor authentication (also MFA, Two-factor authentication, TFA, T-FA or 2FA) is an approach to authentication which requires the presentation of two or more of the three authentication factors: a knowledge factor ("something only the user knows"), a possession factor ("something only the user has"), and an inherence factor ("something only the user is"). After presentation, each factor must be validated by the other party for authentication to occur.